165 Tex. Crim. 339 - White v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1998
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 160 Tex. Crim. 271 - Whitaker v. State · 162 Tex. Crim. 456 - Tellez v. State · 51 Tex. Crim. 106 - Ozark v. State · 93 Tex. Crim. 493 - Tolston v. State · 94 Tex. Crim. 517 - Pinson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The nature of the facts in evidence in this case in support of the offense charged and the penalty authorized to be assessed would make any instruction thereon a comment on the weight of the evidence and tend to convey the opinion of the court to the jury as to the disposition that should be made of the case— hence, would be improper.” White, supra.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cane v. State“At appellant's request the trial court did embody in his charge Article 2, Vernon's P.C., that `The object of punishment is to suppress crime and reform the offender,'....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Teague v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.