Dunlop v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
165 U.S. 486 · 1897
Citation profile
340 federal appellate · 53 district · 188 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 721 later decisions (54 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2019 · most notably United States v. Young (1985), Hamling v. United States (1974)
340 federal appellate · 53 district · 188 state decisions — followed in 30 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rosen v. United States · Knickerbocker Life Ins Co v. Pendleton · Goetz v. Bank of Kansas City · Commonwealth v. Whittaker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 721 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Now. what is [are] obscene, lascivious, lewd, or indecent publications is largely a question of your own conscience and your own opinion; but it must come — before it can be said of such literature or publication — it must come up to this point; that it most be calculated, with the ordinary reader, to deprave him, deprave his morals, or lead to impure purposes. * * ® It is your duty to ascertain, in the first place, if they are calculated to deprave the morals; if they are calculated to lower that standard which we regard, as essential to civilization; if they are calculated to excite those feelings which, in their proper field, are all right, but which, transcending the limits of that proper field, play most of the mischief in the world.” “The construction placed by counsel uijou this is that it practically directed the jury that obscene literature was such as tended to deprave the morals of the public in any way whatever, whereas the true test of what constitutes obscene literature is that which tends to deprave the morals in one way only, namely, by exciting sexual desires and lascivious thoughts. It is not, however, the charge given by the court that was too broad, but the construction put upon it by counsel. The alleged obscene and indecent matter consisted of advertisements by women, soliciting or offering inducements for the visits of men, usually ‘refined gentlemen,’ to their rooms, sometimes under the disguise of ‘baths’ and ‘massage,’ and oftener for the mere purpo”
35 later decisions quote this exact passage“So, if a person be stabbed to death, and another, who was last seen in his company, were arrested near the spot with a bloody dagger in his possession,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hooper“the shoes of an accused person were of peculiar size or shape, and footmarks were found in the mud or snow of corresponding size or shape,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hooper
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.