¶1delivered the opinion of the court.
¶2The same questions and principles which are involved in this case were present in the companion case of Kyle T. Cox v. J. M. Parsons, ante, page 575, 183 S. E. 440, decided at this term of court. There is nothing of fact or otherwise to differentiate them. This case is therefore controlled by that.
¶3The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
¶4Affirmed.