Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 VA 808 - Hale v. Commonwealth

Hale v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 1978
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1978

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

5019361940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sims v. Commonwealth · Dodson v. Commonwealth · McCoy v. Commonwealth · Tucker v. Commonwealth · Puckett v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The prisoner never has to prove any fact either beyond a reasonable doubt or by a preponderance of the evidence. All he has to prove in any case is such a state of facts as will raise a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury as to the existence of the fact or facts to be established by the Commonwealth, * * *’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.