¶1The Board found that respondent’s negligence caused no actual damage and that he paid for his misconduct through the settlement of the malpractice suit. Respondent is remorseful and has cooperated with these disciplinary proceedings. In light of these mitigating factors, the Board’s recommended sanction of a public reprimand is approved.
165 Vt. 562
In re Wenk
Decided April 30, 1996
Supreme Court of Vermont · decided 1996-04-30
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2002
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1996-04-30
View the full empirical analysis of this case →