¶1 (dissenting) — I can follow the majority view as to the charges of manufacturing, the possession of a still and the simple possession of intoxicating liquor, but it was for the jury to say, notwithstanding the statutory presumption, whether or not the possession of intoxicating liquor was for the purpose of sale.
165 Wash. 322
5 P.2d 308
State v. Tuerk
Decided November 24, 1931
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1931-11-24
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1946
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1931-11-24
View the full empirical analysis of this case →