State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2011
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cady v. Dombrowski · 123 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Hill · State v. Ladson · 95 Wash. 2d 143 - State v. Houser · 105 Wash. 2d 632 - State v. Terrovona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`obtaining a warrant is not practical because the delay inherent in securing a warrant would compromise officer safety, facilitate escape or permit the destruction of evidence.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Louthan · State v. Tibbles“(1) the gravity or violent nature of the offense with which the suspect is to be charged; (2) whether the suspect is reasonably believed to be armed; (3) whether there is reasonably trustworthy information that the suspect is guilty; (4) there is strong reason to believe that the suspect is on the premises; (5) a likelihood that the suspect will escape if not swiftly apprehended; and (6) the entry [can be] made peaceably.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Tibbles“Clerk's Papers (CP) at 44; see Suppl. Br. of Resp't at 4; Suppl. Br. of Pet'r at 5. [2] ¶ 9 The exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement applies where”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Tibbles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.