Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 WASHAPP 212 - State v. Hatch

State v. Hatch’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Robertson · State v. Glas · 38 Wash. App. 469 - State v. Jollo · State v. Diaz-Flores · State v. Glas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] defendant's purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire can be readily inferred from circumstantial evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of any person. . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.