State v. Cham’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2020
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Blakely v. Washington · Johnson v. Zerbst · 123 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Hill · 109 Wash. 2d 222 - State v. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“commission of a crime within one hour of release from jail When an individual makes a vagueness challenge that does not involve the First Amendment, courts evaluate the statute as applied rather than evaluating it for facial vagueness. Douglass, 115 Wn.2d at 182 . state V. Murray (Michael David) No. 94346-0 satisfie[d]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“shortly after being released from incarceration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“shortly after release from incarceration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.