165 Wis. 2d 316 - State v. Larsen’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 102 Wis. 2d 58 - Hartung v. Hartung · 109 Wis. 2d 164 - Shuput v. Lauer · 147 Wis. 2d 240 - State v. Jensen · 142 Wis. 2d 658 - Prahl v. Brosamle · 113 Wis. 2d 362 - State v. McConnohie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a process of reasoning which depends on facts that are in the record or are reasonably derived by inference from the record, and yields a conclusion based on logic and founded on proper legal standards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Trial courts have broad discretion in determining the relevance and admissibility of proffered evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.