¶1Judgment and order affirmed, *905with costs. The sufficiency of the supplemental answer was necessarily involved in the previous decision of this case. (See Reilly v. Barrett, 163 App. Div. 922.) Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
166 A.D. 904
Reilly v. Barrett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 1914
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1914-12-15
Decided 1914-12-15