State v. Diaz’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2017
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carroll v. United States · United States v. Ross · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Rogers v. United States · Martin v. Ohio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The State is required to show the defendant knew that he was transporting marijuana. That knowledge can be established ... by showing that the defendant was aware of the high probability that the package[s] contained marijuana, and that he acted with conscious purpose to avoid learning the true contents of the packages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fierro“If you decide that the defendant's conduct was justified, you must find the defendant not guilty. 1”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Diaz“knew that what he was transporting was a narcotic drug”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Francis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.