Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 Ariz. 526 - State v. Thompson

State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2011

6 state decisions

20199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Carrillo · State v. Williams · State v. Carrillo · State v. Dickson · State v. Moreno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The judge does not determine whether the document is authentic, only whether there is some evidence from which the trier of fact could reasonably conclude that it is authentic. Once admitted, the opponent is still free to contest the genuineness or authenticity of the document, and the weight to be given the document becomes a question for the trier of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.