Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 Cal. 442 - Long v. Ryan

Long v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
March 1954
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1954

6 state decisions

2019131920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bury v. Young · Ruiz v. Dow · Moore v. Trott · Kenney v. Parks · Husheon v. Kelley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the present case the intent that the title should not pass upon the condition of the survival of the grantor until after July 22, 1910, was expressed in the writing itself. Her intent, therefore, must have been that upon that contingency there should be no delivery of the deed, and that it should be ineffectual to pass title, but that such title was to remain vested in the grantor.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.