State v. Clemente’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
3 district · 178 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 181 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably White v. Burns (1990), Monroe v. Monroe (1979)
3 district · 178 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 18 U.S.C. § 5
Relies on Simmons v. United States · Guaranty Trust Co. v. York · Jencks v. United States · Palermo v. United States · Guaranty Trust Co. v. York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 181 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“courts have an inherent power, independent of statutory authorization to prescribe rules to regulate their proceedings and facilitate the administration of justice as they deem necessary.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[General Statutes] Sec. 54-86b. RIGHT OF ACCUSED TO EXAMINE STATEMENTS. (a) In any criminal prosecution, after a witness called by the prosecution has testified on direct examination, the court shall on motion of the defendant order the prosecution to produce any statement oral or written of the witness in the possession of the prosecution which relates to the subject matter as to which the witness has testified, and the court shall order said statement to be delivered directly to the defendant for his examination and use. (b) If the prosecution fails to comply with the order of the court, the court shall strike from the record the testimony of the witness and the trial shall proceed unless the court in its discretion shall determine that the interests of justice require that a mistrial be declared.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Marshall“[t]he history of legislative authorization for judicial rule-making, the legislature's authority to make procedural rules and its relation to the court's inherent rule-making ability were discussed in In re Appeal of Dattilo, 136 Conn. 488, 492, 494 , 72 A.2d 50 [1950], in which it was indicated that the statute in question was within both the legislative power and the court's inherent rule-making ability”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. DeJesus
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.