166 Conn. App. 613 - State v. Panek’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · Sedillo v. United States · Horton v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) without the knowledge and consent of such other person, (B) while such other person is not in plain view, and (C) under circumstances where such other person has a reasonable expectation of privacy ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Panek“[s]tatutes must be construed, if possible, such that no clause, sentence or word shall be superfluous, void or insignificant ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Panek“the legislature did not intend to enact meaningless provisions”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Panek
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.