Lederer v. Saake’s Empirical Analysis
166 F. 810 · 1909
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 1938
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Belford Clarke Co v. Scribner · Merrell v. Tice · Osgood v. A. S. Aloe Instrument Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The certificate of the librarian of Congress that two copies of a book were deposited with him is competent evidence of such fact in an action for penalties for infringement of the copyright of such book, and is sufficient where the identity of such copies with the book in suit is shown.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““An author suing for infringement of a copyright has the burden of showing a literal compliance with each and every statutory requirement in the nature of conditions precedent to the acquisition of a valid copyright.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Is the certificate of the librarian, under his official seal, that two copies were so deposited, competent evidence of the fact?””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.