Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 F.1d 982 - In re Christopher Bailey & Son

In re Christopher Bailey & Son’s Empirical Analysis

166 F. 982 · 1909

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 1926
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on York Manufacturing Company v. Arthur Cassell J B · Swarts v. Siegel · Kobusch v. Hand · Livingstone v. Heineman · In re Hines

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.