Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

166 F.2d 1022

Docket No. 10463.

Samples v. Nanney

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1948.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1948-03-15

2 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1948-03-15

¶1Cunningham & Cunningham, of Boone-ville, Miss., for appellants.

¶2Harsh & Pierce, of Memphis, Tenn., for appellee.

¶3Before HICKS, ALLEN, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This case was submitted upon the record and briefs; and it appearing that no exception was taken to the charge of the court, and that appellants’ requests for charges which were refused by the court were inapplicable to the facts of the case; and it appearing that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling the motion for new trial; and no reversible error appearing in the record: it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

/166/f2d/1022 · .json · Public domain