Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 F.2d 213 - Feltman v. Wilding

Feltman v. Wilding’s Empirical Analysis

166 F.2d 213 · 1947

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 1955
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Washington Times Co. v. Bonner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is settled that we cannot review a trial court's decision to grant or deny a new trial on the ground that a verdict was excessive or inadequate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.