Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 F.2d 249 - United States v. Rubinstein

United States v. Rubinstein’s Empirical Analysis

166 F.2d 249 · 1948

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
2
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently February 2005 · most notably United States v. Grayson (1948), United States v. Schoebel (1953)

32 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1901948195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 50 U.S.C. § 226

Relies on Durland v. United States · United States v. Hartwell · Kay v. United States · United States v. Giles · United States v. Corbett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is true that part of the language of the statute is: “knowingly make any false statement . as to the . . . nonliability of himself . . . for service;” but that does not include a statement on which the registrant, at the very moment of filing it, declares that he does not mean to rely; and we think it not an unfair paraphrase of the testimony that Rubinstein said to the board: “Don’t pay any attention to what I have said about the dependency of other people upon me; I am not relying upon that part of my affidavit.” . [A] ¡though in the case at bar Rubinstein might indeed have been laying a false foundation for a future claim, he was not indicted for doing so, and the foundation could not become a crime unless he later built upon it the necessary superstructure by an attempt to use it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.