Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 F.2d 463 - Siaskiewicz v. General Electric Co.

Siaskiewicz v. General Electric Co.’s Empirical Analysis

166 F.2d 463 · 1948

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
October 1974
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently October 1974 · most notably Alvado v. General Motors Corp. (1955), Magma Copper Co. v. Eagar (1966)

28 federal appellate · 4 district ·

1901948195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp. · Trailmobile Co. v. Whirls · In re Public Ledger, Inc. · Gauweiler v. Elastic Stop Nut Corp. of America · MacLaughlin v. Union Switch & Signal Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * *- That discrimination in favor of veterans is as foreign to the purposes of the Act as discrimination against them, the Supreme Court decided when it passed on the issue of ‘super-seniority,’ Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp., 328 U.S. 275 , 66 S.Ct. 1105 , 90 L.Ed. 1230 , 167 A.L.R. 110 ; Trailmobile Company v. Whirls, 331 U.S. 40 , 67 S.Ct. 982 [ 91 L.Ed. 1328 ].” Sias-kiewicz v. General Electric Co., 2 Cir., 1948, 166 F.2d 463, 466 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““(a) Any person inducted into the armed forces under this title “(b) . . . who, in order to per- form such training and service, has left or leaves a position (other than a temporary position) . . . (( “(B) if such position was in the employ of a private employer, such person shall— “(i) if still qualified to perform the duties of such position, be restored by such employer ... to such position or to a position of like seniority, status, and pay; “(2) It is declared to be the sense of the Congress that any person who is restored to a position in accordance with [the foregoing provisions] should be so restored in such manner as to give him such status in his employment as he would have enjoyed if he had continued in such employment continuously from the time of his entering the armed forces until the time of his restoration to such employment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “shall be entitled to participate in insurance or other benefits offered by the employer pursuant to established rules and practices relating to employees on furlough or leave of absence in effect with the employer at the time such person was inducted into such forces.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.