Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 F.2d 475 - In re Searles

In re Searles’s Empirical Analysis

166 F.2d 475 · 1948

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
August 2002
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2002

9 federal appellate ·

801948195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 106 · 28 U.S.C. § 118

Relies on Richmond v. Irons · St Louis Co v. Spiller · In Re Raabe, Glissman & Co. · United States v. Cochrane · Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. Astoria Mahogany Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““a. Dividends or other moneys which remain unclaimed for sixty days after the final dividend has been declared and distributed shall be paid by the trustee into the court of bankruptcy; and at the same time the trustee shall file with the clerk a list of the names and postoffice addresses, as far as known, of the persons entitled thereto, showing the respective amounts payable to them. “b. Dividends remaining unclaimed for one year shall, under the direction of the court,, be distributed to the creditors whose claims have been allowed but not paid in full, and after such claims have been paid in full the balance shall be paid to the bankrupt: Provided, That, in ease unclaimed dividends belong to minors, such minors may have one year after arriving at majority to claim such dividends.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.