Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 F.2d 79 - Zachos v. Sherwin-Williams Co.

Zachos v. Sherwin-Williams Co.’s Empirical Analysis

166 F.2d 79 · 1948

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
July 1965
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co. · Washburn Moen Manuf'G Co v. Beat 'Em All Barbed-Wire Co · Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp. · Smith v. Hall · Gairing Tool Co. v. Eclipse Interchangeable Counterbore Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A patent is a monopoly granted by the public and is of public interest, and ought to exist against all or none.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.