Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 F.2d 851 - Stein v. United States

Stein v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

166 F.2d 851 · 1948

Citation profile

99
cited by 99 later decisions
14
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

65 federal appellate · 4 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently May 2011 · most notably United States v. Sferas (1954), Nelson v. People (1965)

65 federal appellate · 4 district · 19 state decisions — followed in 14 states

46019481950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 171

Relies on Sorrells v. United States · United States v. Di Re · Harris v. United States · Amos v. United States · Hem v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whoever fraudulently or knowingly imports or brings any narcotic drug into the United States or any territory under its control or jurisdiction, contrary to law, or receives, conceals, buys, sells, or in any manner facilitates the transportation, concealment, or sale of any such narcotic drug after being imported or brought in, knowing the same to have been imported or brought into the United States contrary to law, or conspires to commit any of such acts in violation of the laws of the United States, shall be imprisoned not less than five or more than twenty years and, in addition, may be fined not more than $20,000.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.