Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 F.3d 102 - United States v. Jean-Baptiste

United States v. Jean-Baptiste’s Empirical Analysis

166 F.3d 102 · 1999

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
November 2018
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably United States v. Dhinsa (2001), Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & Rodriguez (1999)

29 federal appellate · 1 district ·

390199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1542

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Olano · Kotteakos v. United States · Johnson v. United States · Allen v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I] whether the government’s case against the defendant was strong; [ii] whether the evidence in question bears on an issue that is plainly critical to the jury’s decision ...; [iii] whether the evidence was emphasized in the government’s presentation of its case and in its arguments to the jury; and [iv] whether the case was close.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Although these issues are, for purposes of this appeal, mooted by our decision above, we address them briefly in light of the likelihood that they would recur at a new trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the appellate court can conclude with fair assurance that th[e] evidence did not substantially influence the jury,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.