McFadden v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
166 F.3d 757 · 1999
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
November 2006
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Witherspoon v. Illinois · Wainwright v. Witt · Fuller v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[D]eterminations of juror bias cannot be reduced to question-and-answer sessions which obtain results in the manner of a catechism.... [M]any veniremen simply cannot be asked enough questions to reach the point where their bias has been made ‘unmistakably clear’.... Despite this lack of clarity in the printed record, however, there will be situations where the trial judge is left with the definite impression that a prospective juror would be unable to faithfully and impartially apply the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Allridge v. Cockrell“automatically” vote against the death penalty”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Allridge v. Cockrell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.