Mayhew v. Allsup’s Empirical Analysis
166 F.3d 821 · 1999
Citation profile
17 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably United States v. Farrow (1999), Dorris v. Absher (1999)
17 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp. · Berkery v. Commissioner · Miller v. Gentry · Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“may be waived in exceptional cases or to avoid a miscarriage of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“shall not for any purpose constitute a publication.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.