Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 F.3d 825 - Thomas v. United States

Thomas v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

166 F.3d 825 · 1999

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
May 2014
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently May 2014 · most notably Alkire v. Irving (2003), Duffie v. United States (2010)

26 federal appellate · 1 district ·

350199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6511 · 26 U.S.C. § 6532 · 26 U.S.C. § 6621 · 26 U.S.C. § 6653 · 26 U.S.C. § 6659 · 26 U.S.C. § 7422 · 26 U.S.C. § 7502

Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Flora v. United States · Higgins v. Smith · Knetsch v. United States · United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However, when the appeal from a denial of summary judgment is presented together with an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, we have jurisdiction to review the appropriateness of the district court's denial.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “by its plain language I.R.C. § 6621(c) imposes no inquiry into the taxpayer's investment motive when the transaction is found to be a sham”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A district court's denial of summary judgment is an interlocutory order that is not ordinarily appealable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.