Grundstad v. Ritt’s Empirical Analysis
166 F.3d 867 · 1999
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2018
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on Wood v. Mid-Valley Inc. · Cozzie v. Metropolitan Life Insurance · 98 Ill. App. 3d 167 - Lawndale Steel Co. v. Appel · Bourke v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp. · 51 Ill. App. 2d 289 - Claude Southern Corp. v. Henry's Drive-In, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party...may not use [ Rule 56(d) ] to gain a continuance where he has made only vague assertions that further discovery would develop genuine issues of material fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Illinois courts look to 'whether there has been a material change in risk to the guarantor.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.