Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 F.3d 953 - Vansickel v. White

Vansickel v. White’s Empirical Analysis

166 F.3d 953 · 1999

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 2017
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2017 · most notably White v. VanSickel (1999), Davis v. Woodford (2003)

9 federal appellate ·

220199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Kotteakos v. United States · Penson v. Ohio · Coleman v. Thompson · Wainwright v. Sykes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] procedural default does not bar consideration of a federal claim on either direct or habeas review unless the last state court rendering a judgment in the case `clearly and expressly' states that its judgment rests on a state procedural bar.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a state prisoner has defaulted his federal claim in state court pursuant to an adequate and independent state procedural rule,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “state right to peremptory challenges [afforded by Code of Civil Procedure section 231] is a state-created liberty interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.