Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

166 F. App'x 92

Bastos v. Gonzales

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 13, 2006

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2006-02-13

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty

Decided 2006-02-13

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Ulisses M. Bastos, a native and citizen of Brazil, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen and remand to the immigration judge to apply for asylum based upon changed circumstances. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719,c 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 PETITION DENIED

/166/fappx/92 · .json · Public domain