Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 FRD 10 - Tabas v. Tabas

Tabas v. Tabas’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)

Relies on McI Communications Corporation McI v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company · American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. MCI Communications Corp. · Duquesne Light Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.