State v. Oncor Communications, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1693 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 47 U.S.C. § 151
Relies on Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern California · Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Taylor · Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It has long been the case that suits brought by a state against parties who are not other states may 'be brought in or removed to the [District Courts] ...”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.