Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 FSUPP 400 - In Re Cameron

In Re Cameron’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 1983
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 1983

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

401958196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 103 · 11 U.S.C. § 104 · 11 U.S.C. § 107 · 26 U.S.C. § 6321 (Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966) · 26 U.S.C. § 6322 · 26 U.S.C. § 6323

Relies on Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. Green · Gardner v. State of New Jersey · Sweet v. United States · Sampsell v. Imperial Paper & Color Corp. · Lawrence E. Sexton v. Leopold Louis Dreyfus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to have the courts confine the Saper case ruling to the specific situation existing in that case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.