¶1concurring in part and dissenting in part.
¶2With regard to the indictment relating to the burglary of Pop Breedlove’s store, I agree with the majority that Grant’s testimony was sufficient to support appellant’s conviction of that burglary. However, I join the dissent in concluding that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction for theft by receiving with *85respect to the property stolen from Hayes Truck and Tractor.