Null v. Williamson’s Empirical Analysis
1906
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2006 · most notably 172 Ind. App. 434 - Brown v. Heidersbach (1977), Craven v. Craven (1913)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ricard v. Williams · Mitchell v. Bain · Rennert v. Shirk · Parish v. Kaspare · Nowlin v. Whipple
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * but, as the doctrine of prescription is founded on the presumption of a grant, the person against whom it is asserted may appeal to facts and circumstances for the purpose of showing that the use was not under claim of right ...””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.