Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 KAN 406 - Singleton v. State Highway Commission

Singleton v. State Highway Commission’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
January 1958
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pulliam v. Pulliam · Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Ellis · Iverson v. Claim of Zabel · Brown v. Kimble · Hudson v. Hudson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A final order is one affecting a substantial right in an action when it in effect determines the action and prevents a judgment. “An order sustaining any motion which results in dismissing an action has both effects mentioned in paragraph 1 and is appealable. An order overruling such a motion has neither of such effects and is not appealable. “The denial of a motion to strike or dismiss an appeal, from the award of appraisers, to the district court is not one of the orders of that court from which error lies to this court until the final disposition of the action.” (Syl. HIT 1, 2 and 3.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.