Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 KAN 604 - Gebers v. Marquart

Gebers v. Marquart’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2015

20 state decisions

8019491950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Clutter v. Hill · Burns v. Drake · Waldorf v. Waldorf · Bourke v. Bourke · Erwin v. Erwin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Civil actions can only be commenced within the periods prescribed in this article, after the cause of action shall have accrued; but where, in special cases, a different limitation is prescribed by statute, the action shall be governed by such limitation."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'not relieve [a family member] or any other person having a claim upon the property of [the] estate from having an administrator appointed'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Whatever else may be charged against our decisions dealing with jurisdictional questions arising under the new probate code (G. S. 1947 Supp. ch. 59, art. 22) it must be conceded they have universally held and the 'rule is now established that by reason of its terms any claim or demand against a decedent’s estate or any portion of it, whether denominated absolute or contingent, legal or equitable, must be filed in the probate court as the court possessing exclusive original jurisdiction over all such claims except when provision is made in such code for filing it elsewhere.” [Citing cases.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.