Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 MASS 288 - Harrison v. Pepper

Harrison v. Pepper’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
18
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Lynch v. Johnson (1954), 200 W. Va. 667 - Keesecker v. Bird (1997)

2 federal appellate · 59 state decisions — followed in 18 states

1301896190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Columbia Insurance Company of Alexandria, in Error v. Joseph W. Lawrence, Who Survived Thomas Poindexter · Stillwell v. . Staples · International Trust Co. v. Boardman · Burlingame v. Goodspeed · Reitenbach v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The contract of insurance is a personal contract, and inures to the benefit of the party with whom it is made, and by whom the premiums are paid. It is a contract of indemnity against loss. The sum paid ‘is in no proper or just sense the proceeds of the property’ ... It is not averred, and does not appear, that the defendant intended to make a present of the proceeds of the policy to the plaintiff, or was insuring for her benefit. Whether the amount of indemnity received by the defendant for her loss was more or less than the value of her interest cannot affect the plaintiff. Nor can the defendant be converted into a trustee for the plaintiff by the mere fact that the amount which she received was equal to the full value of the house. It was paid to and received by her as indemnity for the loss which she had sustained, and, as already observed, does not stand in the place of the property insured.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"The contract of insurance is a personal contract, and inures to the benefit of the party with whom it is made, and by whom the premiums are paid. It is a contract of indemnity against loss. The sum paid `is in no proper or just sense the proceeds of the property.'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.