166 Misc. 2d 333 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 1998
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not feasible for this court to speculate that a federal court would have exercised its discretion to allow the negligence cause of action under its supplemental jurisdiction and then use such speculation as a basis to foreclose a claim under the doctrine of res judicata.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.