Wilson v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2001
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“But the statute here in question is more than a mere statute of limitations; moreover, it contains within its own terms those exceptions by which it may be avoided, and the general rule is that when such a statute sets up its own exceptions this will exclude others sought to be imported therein. 25 R.C.L. 983; 59 C.J., p. 1092. ( 166 Miss. at 376 , 146 So. at 856 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“concealed fraud is a case of a designed fraud by which a party knowing to whom the right belongs, conceals the circumstances giving that right and by means of concealment enables himself to enter and hold.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.