Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 Mont. 79 - State v. Tropf

State v. Tropf’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
August 1998
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 1998 · most notably State v. Armstrong (1980), State v. Cope (1991)

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

160197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Meidinger · State v. Straight · City of Billings v. Herold · State Ex Rel. City of Libby v. Haswell · State v. Heiser

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(a) A charge may be amended in matters of substance at any time before the defendant pleads, without leave of court. "(b) The court may permit any charge to be amended as to form at any time before verdict or finding if no additional or different offense is charged and if the substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced. "(c) No charge shall be dismissed because of a formal defect which does not tend to prejudice a substantial right of the defendant." (Emphasis supplied.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The application on which the warrant is issued shall be retained by the judge but need not be filed with the clerk of the court or with the court, if there is no clerk, until the warrant has been executed or has been returned ‘not executed.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.