Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 N.J. 66 - State v. Hackett

State v. Hackett’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Joye v. Hunterdon Central Regional High School Board of Education (2003), Stubbs v. Attorney General of the United States (2006)

6 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

120200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Butler v. Acme Markets, Inc. · State v. Miller · Landrigan v. Celotex Corp. · State v. Pires · Dillard v. HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT AND/OR EDS SYSTEMS

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “mere nudity repeatedly presented at a window can constitute endangering the welfare of children if the other elements of the endangering crime are met”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “a. A person commits a disorderly persons offense if he does any flagrantly lewd and offensive act which he knows or reasonably expects is likely to be observed by other nonconsenting persons who would be affronted or alarmed. .... c. As used in this section: "lewd acts" shall include the exposing of the genitals for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of the actor or of any other person. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:14-4.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “shall include the exposing of the genitals for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of the actor or of any other person. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:14-4.] We are aware that in Zeidell, supra , the Court stated”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.