Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 NW2D 915 - Freitag v. Huiskamp

Freitag v. Huiskamp’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
October 1998
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Del. v. Nicholas · 167 Cal. App. 2d 534 - Smith v. Municipal Court · State Ex Rel. Patterson v. Warren · Parkhurst v. White · Halverson v. Hageman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is defined as meaning the assertion of a legal right ; ... a peremptory claim to a thing of right; ... a request addressed to a person that he will do some act which he is legally bound to do, after the request has been made....'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “it seems inconceivable that a wealthy taxpayer accustomed to paying taxes could misunderstand or misconstrue the letter or think that she could ignore it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.