Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 OHIOAPP3D 188 - State v. Ward

State v. Ward’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
September 2007
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Williams · 147 Ohio St. 30 - Castleberry v. Evatt · State ex rel. City of Toledo v. Lucas County Board of Elections · State v. Aspell · State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Zupancic

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this state and its political subdivisions. This state and its political subdivisions shall not create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance or effect of marriage.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the * * * effect of a marriage.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “offends the Defense of Marriage Amendment to the Ohio Constitution, Section 11, Article XV, because it recognizes”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.