State v. Ward’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Williams · 147 Ohio St. 30 - Castleberry v. Evatt · State ex rel. City of Toledo v. Lucas County Board of Elections · State v. Aspell · State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Zupancic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this state and its political subdivisions. This state and its political subdivisions shall not create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance or effect of marriage.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the * * * effect of a marriage.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“offends the Defense of Marriage Amendment to the Ohio Constitution, Section 11, Article XV, because it recognizes”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.