Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 Ohio App. 3d 262 - State v. Engle

166 Ohio App. 3d 262 - State v. Engle’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably State v. Darmond (2013), State v. Frye (2018)

33 state decisions

180200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · State v. Parson · 32 Ohio St. 3d 1 - City of Lakewood v. Papadelis · State v. Myers · 126 Ohio App. 3d 237 - State Ex Rel. Strategic Capital Investors, Ltd. v. McCarthy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If at any time during the course of the proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with this rule or with an order issued pursuant to this rule , the court may order such party to permit the discovery or inspection , grant a continuance, or prohibit the party from introducing in evidence the material not disclosed, or it may make such other order as it deems just under the circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A trial court must inquire into the circumstances surrounding a discovery rule violation and, when deciding whether to impose a sanction, must impose the least severe sanction that is consistent with the purpose of the rules of discovery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Crim.R. 16(E) grants the trial court wide discretion in determining sanctions for discovery violations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.