166 Ohio App. 3d 688 - In Re Lopez’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2023
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · State v. Awan · In re Murray · 85 Ohio App. 3d 683 - In Re Shaeffer Children · In re Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“due regard for the maturity of the child”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“fundamental liberty interest * * * in the care, custody, and management of [his or her child].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re V.W.“), to the Wyandot County Department of Job and Family Services (hereinafter”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.