Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 OHIOAPP3D 739 - Sabbatis v. Burkey

Sabbatis v. Burkey’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · Dresher v. Burt · Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc. · 87 Ohio App. 3d 704 - Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs. · Vahila v. Hall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[R]escission is not merely a termination of the contract; it is an annulment of the contract. * * * Returning the parties to the status quo is an integral part of rescission, and in doing so it is generally necessary to award the party seeking rescission at least his out-of-pocket expenses.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Accordingly, we remand this matter, to the trial court, for the court to review the affidavit filed by appellant, on October 4, 2005, in support of her request for attorney fees. It is within the trial court's discretion whether or not to grant the additional fees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.