Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 Ohio App. 3d 808 - State v. Ohly

166 Ohio App. 3d 808 - State v. Ohly’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

104
cited by 104 later decisions
2
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

104 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably State v. Westrick (2011), 2009 OK CR 4 - Hampton v. State (2009)

104 state decisions

430200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Laws v. Celebrezze · State v. Miller · State v. Swiger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The privilege of probation rests upon the probationer's compliance with the probation conditions and any violation of those conditions may properly be used to revoke the privilege.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[d]etermination of the credibility of the witnesses is for the trier of fact.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “I. WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN IT REVOKED APPELLANT'S COMMUNITY CONTROL AND IMPOSED A PRISON TERM BECAUSE APPELLANT ASKED FOR SUSBSTANCE [SIC] ABUSE ASSISTANCE AND THIS WAS THE BASIS FOR THE REVOCATION. *Page 5 I. {¶ 20} In his sole assignment of error, Appellant argues that the trial court erred when it revoked his probation. We disagree. {¶ 21}”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.